Summer Funds Not as TightBy Ramy A. Arnaout
Associate News Editor
Although the final approvals of the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program Office funding will be announced on Friday, relieved department UROP coordinators predict that the summer funding will not be as tight as they had feared. Students and faculty have adjusted their plans and are looking at other sources to meet the demand in the fall term.
Even through the budget crunch, the $1 million infusion, and the deadline extension, the Laboratory for Computer Science was able to hire as many UROP students this summer as it did last summer, according to LCS UROP Coordinator Albert Vezza.
Last summer, LCS hired 53 students, winding up "a little oversubscribed," by hiring three more than their average of 50 students, Vezza said. "As far as this year goes, I had the same limit -- 50 students," he said. "We got 40 to 45 students this year, but they're still coming in."
Vezza said that LCS owes its continued high hiring levels in large part to the $1 million transfer to UROP engineered by Provost Mark S. Wrighton. "I think Mark Wrighton's $1 million helped a lot," he said. "I don't think we could have done it without him. Without [the contribution], I would have limited things at about 25 students," he said.
The Department of Chemistry also hopes to hire as many students as last year, according to Paul W. Stewart, senior secretary for the department's UROP coordinator. Surprisingly, in the face of UROP budget woes, Course V has hired 40 UROP students so far, three more than last summer, he said.
Stewart attributed this to keeping the department well informed. "I basically let my department know that we got a million dollars." The faculty were able to discuss the funding situation so that they had a good idea about what was going to happen, he said.
In addition, most chemistry professors chose to split the cost of hiring a UROP student with the UROP office to alleviate the pressure on the UROP office to provide full funding, Stewart said.
Stewart was pleased with the results. "I saw a lot of new professors take UROPs," he said. "Everyone tried to help as best they could."
Assistant Professor Lones A. Smith, UROP coordinator for the department of economics, noted that the department has received about 50 percent more proposals this summer than last summer. Smith expects the acceptance rate to be higher than last year's. He attributed the rise to an all-time high number of junior faculty in the department, who traditionally hire most of the UROP students.
Some students still searching
While most departments are greeting the UROP summer term with guarded optimism, students' prospects are far from rosy. Many students will continue the search for UROPs into the early summer term.
"My search had its ups and downs," said Richard T. Chang '97, who was not able to find a UROP by the new deadline, but is still looking. "My plans now are to get an interesting, worthwhile volunteer UROP while taking a part-time library job the rest of the time. Hopefully that'll cover the cost of room and board," he said.
"I don't know if it's going to work out that way or not, though," said Chang, who is aware of other students in the same situation. "I'll look [for a UROP] until the deadline to cancel summer housing," he said, "if I don't find anything by then, then I will go home."
Fall prospects more bleak
While the one-time contribution of $1 million will ease the summer budget crunch, prospects for the fall term are dim.
"For the most part, I will say that more people will probably apply for full funding," Stewart said. While the new requests for the fall term will put further stress on UROP funds, Stewart believes that lower fall funding limits -- $900 per student in the fall compared with $3,300 in summer -- will help ease the strain. In addition, he expects more students will take UROPs for credit and avoid the intense competition for UROP office funding.
"My guess is that the faculty are not going to be hiring as many UROPers -- there's just not enough money," Vezza said. Faculty will have to "work on clever ways of funding students... if not through the UROP program, then under other programs," he said.
Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences James L. Elliot suggested exploring other research programs. For example, programs such as the National Science Foundation's Research Opportunities for Undergraduates Program, provide "one very big opportunity," he said.
At any rate, "The main goal is to get the students involved in our activities and to provide them with the funds," Vezza said. "So if you find a way [to get funding] that's legitimate, we'll employ it."
"Let's hope that things will look good, and we'll be optimistic if we can," said Professor Gene M. Brown, the UROP coordinator for the biology department. "[UROP] is a very important area, and we'll try to take care of everyone," he said.
"You have to look at [UROP] as part of a learning experience for the undergraduates," he said. "That's what makes MIT a rich environment."