Clinton Considering Curbs on Social Security COLAsBy Steven Mufson
The Washington Post
President Clinton is considering limiting cost-of-living increases for the nation's 41 million Social Security recipients, a White House spokesman said Thursday, provoking sharp criticism from senior citizen groups and a key Democratic senator.
Such limits could save the federal government billions of dollars a year, but would tighten the belts of senior citizens, many of whom rely on their Social Security checks, which average $653 a month, to make ends meet.
"It's one of the issues that's being discussed," White House Communications Director George Stephanopoulos said Thursday. "We haven't made any final decision yet."
And Alice M. Rivlin, deputy Office of Management and Budget director, told a meeting at the National Academy of Social Insurance, that a change in Social Security benefits "is not ruled out in any kind of a shared-sacrifice deficit reduction package."
She said, "There are lots of ways of doing it. I'm not saying it's going to happen, but it certainly is being talked about."
Their comments were the latest efforts by Clinton aides to keep the administration's options open without revealing the contents of the budget package they plan to submit to Congress next month.
Yet by refusing to rule out any measure that might trim the federal budget deficit, the administration has raised worries among groups that would be hardest hit by possible tax increases or spending cuts.
Stephanopoulos would not discuss any specific proposal, but said, "we'll make sure that any plan that we have is both fair and solves the goals of putting growth in the economy and achieving deficit reduction."
Social Security, one of the most politically sacred programs, has not been altered in a major way in a decade.
But Thursday was the second time Clinton and his aides have hinted at possible changes in the $302.2 billion program.
Last month in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Clinton said he would consider accelerating an existing plan for increasing the retirement age to 67 years from 65.
In addition, Clinton aides have said they are considering taxing a bigger portion of Social Security benefits, half of which are currently exempt from taxes.
During a Sept. 1 campaign speech in Macon, Ga., Clinton declared: "We don't need to tamper with Social Security . . . We're not going to fool with Social Security. It's solid. It's secure. It's sound. And I'm going to keep it that way."
Social Security recipients have received an automatic cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, every year since 1975.
The government could save about $10 billion in 1994 if Clinton were to eliminate the next cost-of-living adjustment, which the Social Security Administration estimates will be 3.2 percent.
The adjustments, made in early January, are based on the consumer price inflation. The current average benefit of $653 a month reflects a recent change for 3 percent inflation in 1992.
Budget savings would grow bigger in later years because future adjustments would be made on a lower base.
Many leading members of Congress vehemently oppose changes in Social Security because the country's senior citizens represent such a large and powerful voting bloc.
In addition, many argue that the Social Security is an insurance program and should be kept separate from the rest of the budget.
Though the Congressional Budget Office expects the federal government to run a $310 billion budget deficit during the current fiscal year, the Social Security program will run a surplus of $53 billion.