The Tech - Online EditionMIT's oldest and largest
newspaper & the first
newspaper published
on the web
Boston Weather: 39.0°F | A Few Clouds and Breezy
Article Tools
CFS should not dictate house dining

After reading the statistics posted in The Tech about the membership of the Campaign for Students (notably, 39 percent from East Campus, 8 percent from Random Hall, 6 percent from Burton-Conner, and 3 percent from dorms with house dining) I am going to speak as a member of one of the dorms with a dining hall.

Stop trying to dictate my dining habits.

We operate an almost a democratic system, not a fascist system where the belief that I should waste an additional 3 hours a week shopping and cooking would outweigh my desire to effortlessly eat as much food as I want and run.

I’m not speaking for the other members of the dorms with dining halls, because I know some who are opposed to dining changes and some who are just plain apathetic. I personally find it ridiculous that CFS, a vocal minority, continues to feel like their opinion should completely trump any and all other opinions. The administration has listened; otherwise they would make all undergraduates who live on campus buy into a meal plan. From their perspective, that would be more economical and in line with what other universities do. Instead they are just changing four dorms. They are still offering a choice. Is that not what a free system should do? Last I checked, one of the tenets of the CFS was to make sure that the students had a choice of where to spend their money. Give me my choice to live in my expensive dorm and eat as much as I want. (I would have added “and get fat,” but my metabolism and skateboard don’t seem to allow that).

— A. Andrew D. Jones, III ’10